![]() The displays looked great at the show and in pictures. I have some disappointment that Google hasn't built any kind of face unlock system, despite carving out a big chunk of the front for extra sensors. The dual-camera front system can switch between a wide angle and a normal camera lens, allowing it to "zoom out" and have a better view of a group of friends or a selfie with something in the background. The camera system is another thing that will have to wait for the review. That's a good sign, because, despite how they looked on paper, the Pixel 2's "front-facing speakers" were not any better than the more space-efficient earpiece and bottom speaker combos on devices like the iPhone. I'll have to try the speakers somewhere quieter than at a large event, but Google claims they are 40 percent louder than the Pixel 2's speakers. The justification for both of these compromised front designs comes from two features: the dual front-camera system and the dual front-facing speakers, so they had better be fantastic. At least it's not as ugly as the Pixel 3 XL it's just dated and doesn't feel like a 2018 flagship design. It has top and bottom bezels that are bigger than pretty much any other 2018 smartphone in its class. Google is pretty much at the back of the pack here. Combined with the 3 XL's sizable bottom bezel, I don't think there's a single 2018 phone in the Pixel 3's price range you can point to and call a worse design. The width of the notch means you only get to see three notification icons on the screen before you run out of space. The cutout extends so far into the display that it doesn't fit inside a normal Android status bar, so the bar is twice as tall as normal, which looks ridiculous. The Pixel 3 XL follows the notch display trend, but Google has the biggest notch in the industry. Google has turned in two phones that just aren't up to the 2018 competition. I'm sad to say the front design is just as disappointing in real life as it is in pictures. Google tells me the side material is aluminum, but it has some kind of coating on it that gives it a glossy finish and attracts fingerprints. The phone has a glass sandwich construction, with a glass panel on the top and bottom and a band of material in between. Since the matte coating feels so nice, I immediately wanted it to coat the sides of the phone, too, but I wonder if this was cut for durability concerns. ![]() I was disappointed by the change from metal to glass, but this is a double whammy: all the fragility of glass with none of the scratch-resistant hardness.įurther Reading Android 9 Pie, thoroughly reviewedThe coating on the back stops before it hits the edges of the phone. Harsh camera lighting is pretty much the worst-case scenario for finding scratches, but I've never seen demo units this beat up before at a launch. ![]() Both of the demo phones I photographed at the show already had several scratches on them. There were already visible scratches on both of the demo units I photographed, which you can see, and it's easy to damage the back with something as mundane as a USB-C cable. The coating feels great, but it doesn't seem very durable. The top is bare, shiny glass and a fingerprint magnet, while the rest of the phone has a soft-touch, satin-like matte coating. This year the back is all glass, but the two-tone look remains thanks to two different treatments to the glass. The Pixel phones have traditionally had a two-tone look, accomplished in the past by a mostly metal back with a glass top. The first thing you notice when you pick up either Pixel 3 is the back texture. After scavenging the show floor for info and some experience with the new handsets, we're back to talk impressions. NEW YORK-After an almost endless number of leaks, the Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL have finally been unleashed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |